https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389016
--- Comment #17 from Dave Love <d.love(a)liverpool.ac.uk> ---
(In reply to Hans Pabst from comment #15)
(3) OMP build key is not specified -> similar to #1
I recommend to stay with #3.
Thanks -- I'd meant to change that.
Other comments about the build specification:
- STATIC=0: that's fine if you want shared libraries. Btw, you can build
static libraries in addition if needed.
They're normally omitted in Fedora.
- PREFETCH=1: superfluous, it's the default anyways (CPUID-based
prefetch
strategy).
Thanks. I thought it was documented as building a separate interface, but I
hadn't checked.
- SYM=1: non-default but just fine (if symbols are needed/policy).
It's needed for the debuginfo package, i.e. what you install to use gdb.
One more comment regarding the package warnings: .make files are
indeed
empty, those are build artifacts and do not need to be packaged.
Thanks.
The
spelling of "coprocessor" (as opposed to co-processor) is intentionally wrt
to KNC. Regarding the "spurious-executable-perm", i may rename these scripts
to .sh if that helps (though this sample needs to be scrubbed a bit anyways
;-).
Most of what rpmlint reports isn't actual speling erors and can be ignored.
(It does grate if I have to use US/Cambridge English per policy.)
I don't think there's anything particularly wrong with the executable scripts.
I think the complaint is about them not starting with #! but the ones I checked
don't actually need to. (There's typically rpmlint noise about the contents of
doc/example packages.)
Thanks for the expert comments generally. One question: is it a bug that "make
install" actually builds things after the build stage has run? Ideally it
wouldn't, but I didn't think it was worth worrying about.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component