https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1707080
Petr Menšík <pemensik(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from Petr Menšík <pemensik(a)redhat.com> ---
Found issues:
* The package produces strange named so library
/usr/lib64/libosmo-fl2k.so.0.1git. I think numbers are expected to be in so
version name, git should not be present.
* No release tarball URL is specified. Spec file should at least contain link
to the source code repository, which is also missing. It is not clear where
provided source comes from.
* Also, binaries and libraries should not be part of single package, libs
subpackage should be used [1].
* File /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/10-osmo-fl2k.rules is shipped, but its directory
is not owned by package or required by the package (systemd-udev or
kexec-tools).
1.
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_mixed_use_pac...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component