https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1885430
--- Comment #3 from Carl George 🤠 <carl(a)redhat.com> ---
I want to point out one thing that was brought up in bug 1885495.
Adding a license in a comment of the spec file is only appropriate if you wish
for the spec file itself to be available under a different license than the
default MIT license specified by the FPCA [0]. This does not have to match the
software being packaged. I'd recommend removing it as well for simplicity, but
it's not strictly required.
[0]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main#License_of_Fedora_SPEC_Files
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component