Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622
--- Comment #25 from Tim Fenn <fenn(a)stanford.edu> 2009-07-23 01:33:47 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #24)
(In reply to comment #23)
> > > Yeah, the choices here aren't that great, but I think I'd rather
keep them
> > > separated with some broken linkages than break the fedora licensing...
right?
> >
> > What do you mean, break Fedora licensing..?
>
> Sorry, that didn't sound right - I meant combining libaqua/pmgZ (LGPLv2+) with
> libapbs (BSD) into a single library isn't compatible with fedora licensing?
No problem, BSD is compatible with LGPL, so the result is LGPLv2+.
I did not know that. Well, here's the combined version:
Spec URL:
http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/apbs.spec
SRPM URL:
http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/apbs-1.1.0-4.fc10.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.