https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859627
--- Comment #17 from Austin Chang <austin880625(a)gmail.com> ---
Some findings after looking into licenses in the source files:
1. files labeled as "NTP license":
arm-none-eabi-gdb/gdb-9.2/libiberty/strcasecmp.c,
arm-none-eabi-gdb/gdb-9.2/libiberty/strncasecmp.c : these two files contain a
statement I cannot really identify what license it is (something from UC
Berkeley?)
arm-none-eabi-gdb/gdb-9.2/readline/readline/support/install.sh : This looks
like an old style MIT license
arm-none-eabi-gdb/gdb-9.2/zlib/contrib/iostream2/zstream.h : This looks like
CMR license?
2. file labeled as "ISC License GPL (v3 or later)":
arm-none-eabi-gdb/gdb-9.2/gnulib/import/inet_ntop.c : Yes this file really
contains both GPL and ISC license text.
3. file labeled as "FSF Unlimited License (with Retention) GPL (v2 or later)":
arm-none-eabi-gdb/gdb-9.2/libtool.m4 : This is FSFULLR licensed, with a m4
macro defined at the beginning to be expanded as GPL license text, which would
be used elsewhere.
4. About "Boost" license tag:
I think it is already contained in my spec file(between BSD ans zlib).
Now I should at least remove the "NTP" tag in spec file. You may point out what
to do with above issues or other problems so that I can deal with them at once.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component