https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2136778
Ben Beasley <code(a)musicinmybrain.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |code(a)musicinmybrain.net
--- Comment #10 from Ben Beasley <code(a)musicinmybrain.net> ---
(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #7)
No, the packager does not need to repeat the %license thing if the
license
file is already part of --licensefiles.
There is no rule nor recommendation to have licenses in
/usr/share/licenses/, the only rule is to make them with %license and
%pyproject_save_files already does that, if upstream has the correct
metadata.
See
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/
#_example_spec_file and look up %license.
This comes up a *lot*. I’d like to propose that we explicitly clarify this
point in the Licensing Guidelines, but I haven’t yet figured out how to word it
without making the relevant section too verbose and meandering.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2136778