https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1612092
--- Comment #4 from Neal Gompa <ngompa13(a)gmail.com> ---
@Aurelien, is there a reason that we're doing this instead of just updating
mailman and splitting mailman2 out as an alternate package?
The idea would be that mailman3 would be the default mailman people would
install.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component