Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576591
--- Comment #11 from Nikola Pajkovsky <npajkovs(a)redhat.com> 2011-01-26 05:30:13 EST
---
http://npajkovs.fedorapeople.org/iptraf-ng.spec
http://npajkovs.fedorapeople.org/iptraf-ng-1.0.3.55.gae6e.dirty-1.fc15.sr...
(In reply to comment #10)
Thanks, this is starting to look good.
Some warnings from rpmlint:
W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 12)
- convert tabs in Obsoletes: and Provides: to spaces.
W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes iptraf
W self-obsoletion iptraf obsoletes iptraf = 1.0.3.52.gdaa1-1.fc14
- these seems dangerous,
fixed
W: invalid-url Source0:
https://fedorahosted.org/releases/i/p/iptraf-ng/iptraf-ng-1.0.3.52.gdaa1....
HTTP Error 404: Not Found
- can't find the tarball on the website,
would also be nice to remove the gdaa1 postfix.
the naming convention is A.B.C.X.sha1.dirty-%{release}
where,
A.B.C - is version of iptraf-ng
X - is how many commits are iptraf ahead of A.B.C version
sha1 - taken from git description
optional dirty - show only if I have dirty working directory (Right now I
middle of some work)
This is a snapshot taken from git. For table release it will be looking as
iptraf-ng.A.B.C-%{release}
W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.0.2-3
['1.0.3.52.gdaa1-1.fc14',
'1.0.3.52.gdaa1-1']
- easy to fix
W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man8/iptraf-ng.8.gz 27: warning: macro
`Biptraf' not defined
Fix these and I will do the formal review.
This won't be fixed till I release a new stable version or I put iptraf-ng into
rawhide.
Thank you for taking time to look at it.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.