https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094864
--- Comment #7 from Remi Collet <fedora(a)famillecollet.com> ---
(In reply to Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) from comment #6)
>- filtering private is no more needed in f20+ (and rhel7)
Obviously i've missing something. Where it stated? Meantime if it is not
targeted to El5 i'm prefer leave it for Fedora 19.
You can conditionalize it (which make easier to detect when could be dropped)
%if 0%{?fedora} < 20 && 0%{?rhel} < 7
>- why don't you provide the -devel sub package ? (with the installed header, and
perhaps the upstream test suite... useful as documentation)
I don't know anything which may use it, do you? Is it have worth at all?
I don't know anything which use it yet.
I'm used to follow upstream desing.
But will be easy to fix if needed later...
Your choice.
mv {CREDITS,LICENSE} ./%{pecl_docdir}/
%doc %peclName-%{version}/%{pecl_docdir}/{CREDITS,LICENSE}
This result as
/usr/share/doc/php-pecl-xmldiff
/usr/share/doc/php-pecl-xmldiff/CREDITS
/usr/share/doc/php-pecl-xmldiff/LICENSE
While expected is (check: "pecl list xmldiff")
/usr/share/doc/pecl/xmldiff
/usr/share/doc/pecl/xmldiff/CREDITS
/usr/share/doc/pecl/xmldiff/LICENSE
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component