Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: sdcc - Small Device C Compiler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=226795
------- Additional Comments From rc040203(a)freenet.de 2007-02-02 05:12 EST -------
(In reply to comment #9)
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> >
> > IMO, all but the sdc-prefixed ones are way too generic. Does this package
> > support --program-prefix?
>
> While I see your point here, I can see using --program-prefix potentially
> causing problems with dependent packages...
>
Would it be better to install everything under /usr/sdcc-i386, as suggested for
cross compilers?
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/CrossCompilers No.
This would conflict with GCC's conventions.
But what would work is to install the apps somewhere outside of %{_bindir},
e.g
/usr/lib/sdcc/bin
or
/usr/libexec/sdcc
and to install symlinks or wrapper scripts named "sdcc-<app>" into
%{_bindir}
Other packages wanting to use the "non-prefixed" versions then could apply
PATH=/usr/lib/scdc/bin:$PATH (or similar) to access the unprefixed versions.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.