https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438673
--- Comment #63 from jiri vanek <jvanek(a)redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Jonny Heggheim from comment #62)
(In reply to jiri vanek from comment #61)
> Maybe also your indivdual subpackages (src, javadoc, [devel]) should be
> bound by NVR[A] with main package. Well the devel have same fun with [arch]
> :)
I used openjdk as a guide for what parent package to the subpacakges should
require. javadoc packages tends to have no requires, while source and devel
did have requires on the parent.
yup, go on with that.
Looks like there will be no issues with require with devel as noarch:
$ rpm -q --requires -p openjfx-devel-8.0.152-8.b03.fc25.noarch.rpm
/bin/sh
openjfx(x86-64) = 8.0.152-8.b03.fc25
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1
Thank you for verification.
Imho except .build-id, license, which should be GPL2 [do we wont "with
classpath exception"?] (javafxpackager BSD) and java/java-devel + self requires
we are done here. Can you publish one more spec+srpm (eventually also with
scratch) which we can test?
TYVM!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component