https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860688
--- Comment #3 from Andy Mender <andymenderunix(a)gmail.com> ---
Okay - ncurses and openssl worked with pkgconfig() but gdbm
didn't so I have left that as -devel.
I tried building from your SPEC file with a little tweak for "pkgconfig(gdbm)"
in Fedora 33 (local x86_64 mock environment), but the -devel package in Fedora
33 doesn't seem to provide a pkgconfig file either.
I'm not sure where that documentation size has come from:
[p@athena:~/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/epic5-2.1.2-1.fc32.x86_64/usr/share/doc/epic5] % du -sh .
516K .
[p@athena:~/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/epic5-2.1.2-1.fc32.x86_64/usr/share/doc/epic5] % ls -R |
wc -l
37
Again, not sure where these size numbers have come from!
[p@athena:~/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/epic5-2.1.2-1.fc32.x86_64/usr/share] %
du -sh .
1.1M .
Thanks for double-checking this! Don't worry about the sizes then.
I'm not too sure why this is failing?
There are some issues related to annobin, I think. I had to jump through a
couple of hoops in my recent reviews as well.
Also, and this is totally my fault, according to the licensing guidelines
(
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#SoftwareLicenses),
"GPL" alone is not a valid license. It should say "GPL+", which
translates to
"A GPL or LGPL licensed package that lacks any statement of what version that
it's licensed under".
As a last check I ran extra Koji builds for Fedora 32 and 33 - all clear:
-
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=47886526
-
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=47886434
Package approved! You just need a sponsor now :).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component