https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119494
--- Comment #99 from Stansoft <rpm(a)stansoft.org> ---
d) libaubit4gl.so should link to libaubit4gl.so.1 not directly to
libaubit4gl.so.1.5.3
Is there a standard defined somewhere for how the links should be setup? I can
find it done both ways on Fedora.
libaubit4gl.so -> libaubit4gl.so.1 -> libaubit4gl.so.1.5.3
or
libaubit4gl.so -> libaubit4gl.so.1.5.3
libaubit4gl.so.1 -> libaubit4gl.so.1.5.3
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_devel_packages
"Please note that in most cases, only the fully versioned shared library file
(/usr/lib/libfoo.so.3.2.0) is an actual file, all of the other files are
symbolic links to it."
This seems to imply the second option of linking I have shown above.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119494