Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476600
--- Comment #8 from Conrad Meyer <konrad(a)tylerc.org> 2009-10-29 22:11:40 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #7)
I guess that depends on what upstreams purpose with the files is? Are
they
installed on purpose or is it an oversight?
FWIW I can't imagine any reasons why .c files should be included in any
package. Theoretically it could perhaps make sense to expose the C code as a C
library and put the .h files in a -devel package, but I don't think that is
upstreams intention.
Agree. I think it's just upstream being braindead (Zope does some unintelligent
things).
Re: Putting the 3 other modules in some subdirectory:
It _could_ be done in the ZODB module simply by inserting the right
path in
sys.path before importing - or by manipulating sys.modules. But I don't know if
I would propose doing it in a Fedora patch.
I think we need input from upstream if they see it as one module or as 4
modules each on their own right. In either case it could be nice if they
distributed it in a way which matched their intention.
I agree. I've sent an email to upstream asking for clarification on this.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.