Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817268
--- Comment #13 from Alec Leamas <leamas.alec(a)gmail.com> 2012-05-09 06:53:17 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #11)
IMHO, the best practice for OpenERP is to incorporate and keep
maintaining the
needed modules from Faces, if OpenERP license compatible with GPL. Then if the
maintenance is obvious, this can be considered as forking and acceptable in
Fedora.
The OpenERP license is AGPLv3, which is compatible with GPLv2+
OpenERP includes the sources today. This clearly constitutes a bundling, and
this request is really about unbundling the faces library from OpenERP. See
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries. Basically, I need
to either package faces or get a bundling exception. In this case, I'm certain
that a request for bundling exception would give a "package separately" reply.
The patch is basically between what's in OE today and (partly) works, and the
upstream which is unusable.
(In reply to comment #12)
Patching faces/__init__.py actually changes the API of the module, so
I
considers it too heavy.
Shall we ask the list about this? Seems that we just disagree ?! As far as I
know, there is no rule blocking this kind of patching. OTOH, not everything is
covered in rules, it's also about overall judgment. Which can be harder to
agree on, though.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.