https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079784
--- Comment #39 from Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel(a)redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #38)
> You can have a systemd-boot-x86_64.srpm package which is
> exclusivearch x86_64 and produces an empty main package plus a
> systemd-boot-unsigned-x64.noarch subpackage.
OK. We could do that. I don't particularly *like* the idea, but I guess
the update+build would be scripted anyway, so doing it for each architecture
would be tolerable. A side-tag can be used so that there's just one update
in the end.
Before starting work on this: is this important / useful enough to justify
the effort?
Hmm, I was about to answer 'kernel cross builds' but I suspect 'dracut
--uefi'
(which needs the stubs from the package) is not going to work for cross builds
anyway. So I'd say hold for now, lets wait with this until we have an actual
use case.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079784