Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499319
--- Comment #8 from Guido Grazioli <guido.grazioli(a)gmail.com> 2009-05-09 08:00:48
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #7)
(In reply to comment #2)
> NEEDSWORK - The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and
> meet the Licensing Guidelines
> - some files are under CMU license (BSD like), fix the License tag
CMU is compatible with GPL, and the CMU files are compiled with the GPL files,
resulting in a binary that is solely under GPL. Thus license tag is GPLv3+.
Ok, my bad, got that one now.
> NEEDSWORK - Every binary RPM package which stores shared library
files must
> call ldconfig in %post and %postun
> - add ldconfig calls
This wouldn't do anything since no libraries are installed in standard library
directories (and no file is shipped into /etc/ld.so.conf.d/). :)
ok; i tough that you might have /usr/lib/tcl8.5 in a file under
/etc/ld.so.conf.d, provided by some other tcl- package.
(In reply to comment #4)
> About the NetSnmp library you ship and build with your package, isnt it already
> available on Fedora? you should try to avoid library duplicates in that case.
There's no netsnmp library in the package, it links to the netsnmp library.
Sorry, i was a bit confused here. This package ships the sources of the snmp
tools, which are part of the upstream project, and are shipped with Fedora in
net-snmp-utils.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.