https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292040
--- Comment #14 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <dominik(a)greysector.net>
---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #13)
(In reply to Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski from comment
#12)
> (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #11)
> > Package Review
> > ==============
> >
> > Legend:
> > [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
> > [ ] = Manual review needed
> >
> > ==== Issues ====
> >
> > - Please, use %{_pkgdocdir} or %doc macro for documentation files.
>
> I don't understand what you mean here. The spec already does this:
> %files doc
> %{_pkgdocdir}
>
>
-doc sub-package should provide its own license file;
Right, I'll add it, though I think it's trivial enough to do upon import.
inside it, I guess you can tag all documentation with %doc without
making a
%{buildroot}%{_defaultdocdir}/tng directory.
No, because then it'll end up in /usr/share/doc/tng-doc. Right now it installs
nicely into /usr/share/doc/tng.
If there's nothing else, please approve.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component