https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828544
Simone Caronni <negativo17(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #14 from Simone Caronni <negativo17(a)gmail.com> ---
(In reply to comment #12)
I believe megaglest-data should be the owner of %{_datadir}/megaglest
(what
was removed in the previous change, and megaglest lists
%{_datadir}/megaglest/*).
megaglest-data is supposed to be installed before megaglest, that is or
should be the reason megaglest-data does not require megaglest, but
megaglest requires megaglest-data.
Ok, to me is fine as long the 2 packages go along.
Also listing as you did:
%files
%doc docs/*
%dir %{_datadir}/megaglest
%{_datadir}/megaglest/configuration.xml
%{_datadir}/megaglest/data/
%{_datadir}/megaglest/glest*
%{_datadir}/megaglest/maps/
%{_datadir}/megaglest/megaglest.bmp
%{_datadir}/megaglest/scenarios/
%{_datadir}/megaglest/techs/
%{_datadir}/megaglest/tilesets/
%{_datadir}/megaglest/tutorials/
Is the same as:
%files
%doc docs/*
%{_datadir}/megaglest
Because the "ownership" is generated at build time, and the resulting rpm is
identical in both cases. If you prefer, the verbose one is fine.
(In reply to comment #13)
You can also specify urls this way:
http://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/
Package approved!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.