Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: codeblocks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201674
------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael(a)gmx.net 2006-08-13 06:41 EST -------
I think that for SVN repos there should be possible to use
revision number. With CVS there is no such possibility so the
dates must be used.
Not true. Surely you could check out from CVS using a branch tag
or revision.
Please use the date for SVN checks, too, and optionally put the
revision number at the right. Like:
codeblocks-1.0-0.1.20060731svn.src.rpm
or:
codeblocks-1.0-0.1.20060731svn2824.src.rpm
or:
codeblocks-1.0-0.1.20060803cvs.src.rpm
There is no necessity to squeeze SVN revision numbers or CVS tags/revs
into the package Release. Instead, add a comment in your spec on how
to check out the included source code.
The most interesting information about pre-releases is the date, which
is independent from whether the source is maintained in SVN or CVS or
a different VCS.
Further info:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-d97a3f40b6d...
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.