https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2136778
Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags|needinfo?(mhroncok(a)redhat.c |
|om) |
--- Comment #7 from Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> ---
No, the packager does not need to repeat the %license thing if the license file
is already part of --licensefiles.
There is no rule nor recommendation to have licenses in /usr/share/licenses/,
the only rule is to make them with %license and %pyproject_save_files already
does that, if upstream has the correct metadata.
See
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#_exampl...
and look up %license.
My comment for the Root License Directory patch does say that files marked as
License-File in upstream metadata are marked as %license in the file list. It
does not say that you should duplicate the %license entry at all.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2136778