Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: java-1.7.0-icedtea - IcedTea runtime and development
environments
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253691
------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta(a)iki.fi 2007-08-21 07:49 EST -------
(In reply to comment #1)
Not a full review, just a few observations:
E: java-1.7.0-icedtea binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-icedtea-1.7.0.0/jre/bin/keytool
['$ORIGIN/../lib/i386/jli', '$ORIGIN/../jre/lib/i386/jli']
rpmlint should check for $ORIGIN before issuing this message since $ORIGIN
rpaths are not hard-coded.
Not all $ORIGIN RPATHs are desirable anyway though. See
/usr/lib/rpm/check-rpaths-worker in >= 4.4.2.1 rpm-build versions (or
rpmdevtools <= 5.4) and/or try building the package with these checks enabled
(see rpmdev-setuptree) to see if it flags them as bad.
W: java-1.7.0-icedtea uncompressed-zip
/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-icedtea-1.7.0.0/jre/lib/jsse.jar
This is an rpmlint bug: the jar file is compressed.
Can you upload the binary package or just the jsse.jar which triggers this
message somewhere so I can check what's up?
E: java-1.7.0-icedtea-demo invalid-soname
/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.7.0-icedtea-1.7.0.0/demo/jvmti/mtrace/lib/libmtrace.so
libmtrace.so
These files are meant to be dlopen'd, not linked-to directly, so they should
not have a versioned soname.
Isn't versioning the very purpose of sonames? What would a versionless soname
be useful for?
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.