https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1992629
Jakub Kadlčík <jkadlcik(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jkadlcik(a)redhat.com
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Kadlčík <jkadlcik(a)redhat.com> ---
Hello Hirotaka,
thank you for the package.
Version: 4.3.0
I am not familiar with
launchpad.net and I am not sure how to find
what is the latest official release but the tarballs here
https://tarballs.opendev.org/openstack/oslo.messaging/
go as high as 14.0.0
Should we rather package a higher version?
I think a better URL would be
https://launchpad.net/oslo.messaging
%global common_desc2 \
Tests for the Oslo Middleware library.
We can keep this if you prefer but the variable name is
non-descriptive and it is used only once. I would simply do
%description -n python3-%{pkg_name}-tests
Tests for the Oslo Middleware library.
and drop the variable.
# License file for jslibs using in -doc subpkg
Source1: LICENSE_doc
In the package review template, we have the two following checks
[ ]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[ ]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
If the package documentation is indeed available under a different
license, can you please ask upstream to add its license file so we
don't have to do it in Source1?
Also, the LICENSE_doc file isn't present in the SRPM file, so I am not
really sure where it comes from
$ rpm -qpl python-oslo-middleware-4.3.0-1.src.rpm
0x4c29ff0e437f3351fd82bdf47c5a3bc787dc7035.txt
oslo.middleware-4.3.0.tar.gz
oslo.middleware-4.3.0.tar.gz.asc
python-oslo-middleware.spec
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1992629