https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1867321
--- Comment #4 from Andy Mender <andymenderunix(a)gmail.com> ---
Thank you for review! For sure ansible-collections-netbox-netbox is
my package and I am creator of all those packaging-related macros for Ansible :)
Ah, wasn't aware of that, apologies!
I somehow did not notice this, I've fixed it in spec and also
opened issue in upstream
https://github.com/ansible-collections/ansible.netcommon/issues/116.
Thanks for doing this. I double-checked the files in question and yes,
licensecheck wasn't wrong. There is a little note about possible downstream
re-licensing, though:
# This code is part of Ansible, but is an independent component.
# This particular file snippet, and this file snippet only, is BSD licensed.
# Modules you write using this snippet, which is embedded dynamically by Ansible
# still belong to the author of the module, and may assign their own license
# to the complete work.
I re-ran fedora-review. The rpmlint log is clean now:
Rpmlint
-------
Checking: ansible-collection-ansible-netcommon-1.1.2-1.fc33.noarch.rpm
ansible-collection-ansible-netcommon-1.1.2-1.fc33.src.rpm
ansible-collection-ansible-netcommon.src: W: unexpanded-macro URL
%{ansible_collection_url}
ansible-collection-ansible-netcommon.src: W: invalid-url URL %{ansible_collection_url}
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
Package approved!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component