https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1932728
Aleksei Bavshin <alebastr89(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags|needinfo?(alebastr89@gmail. |
|com) |
--- Comment #4 from Aleksei Bavshin <alebastr89(a)gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Davide Cavalca from comment #3)
Outstanding issues:
- no package is owning /etc/sway/config.d; this should be owned either by
this package, or by sway itself if it's a generic sway thing that others may
drop configs into
Will be owned by sway, see
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/sway/pull-request/11
I checked other specs and I've never seen this part of the guildelines being
applied to target files (see gnome-session and plasma-workspace).
I'm not opposed to adding the scriptlets though, just not sure if those will do
anything meaningful.
Also, the specfile lists this under MIT, but licensecheck detects it
an
Expat license (although it is actually MIT afaict). It'd be good to add
license headers to the upstream sources as well, but it's not a blocker.
The commonly used MIT variant is the same as Expat license. Licensecheck is
either not aware of that or uses Expat to avoid ambiguity with MIT/X11 and
other variants.
AFAIK, license headers are not required and certainly won't affect licensecheck
output.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component