https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079784
--- Comment #11 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek(a)in.waw.pl> ---
(In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #8)
There's a couple of things you probably want to do here:
* The systemd-boot-unsigned and systemd-boot packages should have their efi
architectures as suffixes, similar to shim and grub
Hmm, but why? I don't see any guideline that'd require this, and it makes
things more complicated.
* Since this package provides the signed versions, please add
systemd-boot-signed-%efi_arch Provides (shim does this too)
What about 'Provides:systemd-boot-signed(%{efi_arch)) = %version-%release' ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079784