https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079784
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |kraxel(a)redhat.com
--- Comment #32 from Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel(a)redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #11)
(In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #8)
> * The systemd-boot-unsigned and systemd-boot packages should have their efi
> architectures as suffixes, similar to shim and grub
Hmm, but why? I don't see any guideline that'd require this, and it makes
things more complicated.
Can we also make the packages noarch please, simliar to edk2?
That way I can -- for example -- install the aarch64 package on a
x86_64 machine and use the efi stubs when cross-compiling kernels.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079784