https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438673
--- Comment #61 from jiri vanek <jvanek(a)redhat.com> ---
(In reply to jiri vanek from comment #60)
(In reply to Jonny Heggheim from comment #58)
> (In reply to jiri vanek from comment #54)
> > You are not requireing any "java" ( or "java-devel" for
devel subpackage) is
> > it intentional? It may be (and my bindings are bringing those), but do not
> > gave much sense....
>
> I did not want to introduce premature requires, I think now is a good time
> to decide what requires each package should have.
Probably good idea.
Currently on my side:
java-1.8.0-openjdk-openjfx requires java-1.8.0-openjdk and openjfx
java-1.8.0-openjdk-openjfx-debug requires java-1.8.0-openjdk-debug and
openjfx
java-1.8.0-openjdk-openjfx-devel requires java-1.8.0-openjdk-devel and
openjfx-devel
java-1.8.0-openjdk-openjfx-devel-debug requires
java-1.8.0-openjdk-devel-debug and openjfx-devel
Feel free to ignore debug variants. They have nothing to do with you.
java and java devel is always required in same VRA as fx subpackage. In
adition, openjdfx is required in same architecture as fx subpackage. See the
patch from #c56
I think that your packages needs only:
openjfx requires java
openjfx-devel requires java-devel
Still I do not claims it as best idea, nor I'm saying that mya laready
pushed requires are best what could be done. But well.. what else to do :)
Maybe also your indivdual subpackages (src, javadoc, [devel]) should be bound
by NVR[A] with main package. Well the devel have same fun with [arch] :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component