https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198246
--- Comment #7 from Carlos (Morel-Riquelme) <iddnna(a)gmail.com> ---
Thank Paulo, here are my answers
1) i use oflb prefix cuz the font is is published as "open font library" and
parag recommend this.
2) the version of package is equal to the metadata in the font, in my first
revision my version was 0.1 or 1 , but parag tell me that is god idea respect
the metadata in the font. so i just run ttname -a coval.otf
3) parag recommend use 63, now i can't remember the wiki link with the info,
sorry
4)thank for the suggestion
5) Now i nned lear about fedora review and how make a good reviews of other
packages
6) Also run appstream-util over the font.xml,
but i add to the buildrequire appdata-tools
Thank Paulo :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component