Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=752169
--- Comment #12 from Mattia Meneguzzo <hal8600(a)hotmail.it> 2011-12-12 10:11:17 EST
---
(In reply to comment #9)
(In reply to comment #11)
In a such a case, the timestamp of the archive should be used as a
version;
this should be here 20111205, for example.
Thank you, Tim and Mohamed.
Here's the new version of the package, corrected according to your valuable
suggestions:
Spec URL:
http://db.tt/NHscmjFS
SRPM URL:
http://db.tt/wf9g2TAC
By the way, since the name of the package has changed, should I file a new
review request or can I go on with this one?
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.