https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1889072
--- Comment #3 from Andy Mender <andymenderunix(a)gmail.com> ---
The upstream is dead. Changed URL to fork.
Is the fork just a different URL or is it a different project? From the GitHub
page it seems like it's a thin wrapper around the original argyllcms located
here:
http://www.argyllcms.com/
What I'm trying to say is that the relationship between the package and
upstream should be clear.
Below still stands, I think:
[!]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package
is arched.
Note: Arch-ed rpms have a total of 4085760 bytes in /usr/share
Review: Might require an extra -data subpackage
The rest looks better now.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component