https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295115
Tim Hawkins tim.thawkins@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jeremy.fergason@gmail.com, | |tim.thawkins@gmail.com Flags| |needinfo?(jeremy.fergason@g | |mail.com)
--- Comment #29 from Tim Hawkins tim.thawkins@gmail.com --- (In reply to jeremy.fergason from comment #26)
I got the Todos added into the most recent version of the spec file. Swift is a complicated packaging scenario and I believe that it conforms to the Fedora Packaging Guidelines.
The one fly in the ointment is the conflict with LLDB. I see no good way around this. If we rename the swift version of lldb it will be confusing to users as all the swift documentation just says type lldb. If we don't rename it then there is a conflict with the lldb package.
At this point I need a sponsor and a review. I'm not sure how to go about getting that so until I hear otherwise the SPEC is ready to go.
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jdfergason/swift-rpm/master/SPECS/ swiftlang.spec
I will give this a go on fedora 25 and see if your spec still works, we should change the version this bug relates to to f25.
I seem to have built up a community around a "hack" script i built, and i want to retire it if possible, and redirect it to more "official" distro support.
https://github.com/FedoraSwift/fedora-swift