https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109390
--- Comment #15 from Milan Bouchet-Valat <nalimilan(a)club.fr> ---
Actually, I already have an llvm3.3 package ready for a long time, which I can
rename to llvm33. I was more asking for your opinion about having another
versioned-LLVM package in Fedora, since anyway I'd need support to get this
review request accepted.
I don't need clang, and indeed I realized the build fails if I enable it in
64-bit Rawhide (but not in other versions). Is that expected?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component