https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1778530
Daiki Ueno <dueno(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |tmraz(a)redhat.com
Flags| |needinfo?(tmraz(a)redhat.com)
--- Comment #3 from Daiki Ueno <dueno(a)redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Gary Buhrmaster from comment #2)
Thank you for the update; the updated spec looks good to me. I realized that I
missed that the FE-NEEDSPONSOR flag was set while I don't have the privilege.
Tomas, could you take a look perhaps?
> I'm also not sure if this explicit naming is ok; I would
rather
> use libfido2-tools.
I selected the name to be compatible with the debian packages that upstream
provides. My initial thought was name compatibility was likely desirable to
try to minimize unnecessary distro differences. If you prefer
libfido2-tools I can make that change, but I have not for this spec update.
I await further feedback.
Sounds reasonable to me.
> - It would be good to bundle the gpg signature and verify it at
%prep.
Currently the project does not sign releases. I have opened an issue with
the project requesting that they do include signatures for future releases.
I was referring to the Yubico's release page, where .sig is also provided:
https://developers.yubico.com/libfido2/Releases/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component