https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=972348
--- Comment #3 from Rich Mattes <richmattes(a)gmail.com> ---
I don't think it's necessary. I've been using a virtual provides for
ros-%{name} with the other packages (e.g. catkin). I think it's might be better
to leave it as actionlib and use the virtual provides for ros-actionlib to be
consistent.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component