https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262470
--- Comment #3 from Globe Trotter <itsme_410(a)yahoo.com> ---
Pete,
Since Major did not respond yet, I was looking at this (I was the original
packager on BZ, see the duplicate, now closed, which preceded this one).
- LICENSE file should go in every subpackage, not only -doc
How does one do this?
Separately, I had some warnings on rpmlint using my spec file: see 1234208 but
, no erors.
$ rpmlint python-PyPDF2-1.24-1.1.fc22.src.rpm
python-PyPDF2.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US decrypting ->
decryption, encrypting, decrying
python-PyPDF2.src: W: invalid-license BSD-3-Clause
python-PyPDF2.src: W: no-url-tag
python-PyPDF2.src:29: W: macro-in-comment %{modulename}
python-PyPDF2.src:29: W: macro-in-comment %{version}
python-PyPDF2.src: E: specfile-error warning: bogus date in %changelog: Thu Jul
11 2015 stat.maitra(a)inbox.com
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 5 warnings.
maitra@alakananda 21:59:54~$ rpmlint python-PyPDF2-1.24-1.1.fc22.src.rpm
python-PyPDF2.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US decrypting ->
decryption, encrypting, decrying
python-PyPDF2.src: W: invalid-license BSD-3-Clause
python-PyPDF2.src: W: no-url-tag
python-PyPDF2.src:29: W: macro-in-comment %{modulename}
python-PyPDF2.src:29: W: macro-in-comment %{version}
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings.
Are these important?
Of course, perhaps Major will respond with the corrections you
requested/suggested.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component