https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129303
--- Comment #4 from Sergey <sergey(a)mende.spb.ru> ---
(In reply to Sergey from comment #2)
> e) Maybe worth asking upstream to soname the library?
I have asked Joseph on his versioning policy in general and he replied that
he has no one [0]. As 1) Joseph adds the functionality on as needed basis,
2) there
are obvious bugfixes, 3) camotics builds properly with up-to-date version of
cbang
and 4) cbang exports c++ classes, I decided to use `version.subversion` as
an so version,
leaving `.revision` for bug fixes in cbang. The leading zero in `libcbang0`
is from
upstream, I suspect that it is somehow related to debian packaging/naming,
so I
leaved this as is. However, I will ask Joseph again about soname
specifically.
Done, confirmed upstream
https://github.com/CauldronDevelopmentLLC/cbang/issues/103
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129303