https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986170
gil cattaneo <puntogil(a)libero.it> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags| |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo <puntogil(a)libero.it> ---
(In reply to Simone Caronni from comment #2)
(In reply to Simone Caronni from comment #1)
> [!]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
> Note: Found : Packager: Simone Caronni <negativo17(a)gmail.com>
That's my local .rpmmacros.
> [!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
> file
> from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
> [!]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
Fixed in spec file; has it been reported upstream?
yes @
https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-core/issues/88
> [!]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper
Obsoletes and
> Provides are present.
> jackson-core.noarch: W: self-obsoletion jackson2-core <= 2.2.2 obsoletes
> jackson2-core = 2.2.2
Can you fix this? Spec file should read:
Obsoletes: jackson2-core < %{version}
Provides: jackson2-core = %{version}
done
As per:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Renaming.
2FReplacing_Existing_Packages
Please fix it before importing. Package approved.
Spec URL:
http://gil.fedorapeople.org/jackson-core.spec
SRPM URL:
http://gil.fedorapeople.org/jackson-core-2.2.2-2.fc19.src.rpm
New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: jackson-core
Short Description: Core part of Jackson
Owners: gil
Branches: f19
InitialCC: java-sig
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=bIr2e9ggpI&a=cc_unsubscribe