Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622
--- Comment #37 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola(a)iki.fi> 2009-07-27 15:16:26 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #36)
(In reply to comment #33)
> (In reply to comment #32)
> > I just removed the %exclude statement and built using F11 (since I won't
be
> > packaging this for F10 anyway).
>
> .. but won't you be building for EPEL, if you need this for pymol?
>
Right... in that case, using rm -f in %install isn't enough -
brp-python-bytecompile runs after %install, so it just recreates the .pyc/.pyo
files. The other option is to rename the files so they don't have a .py
extension, but I'm not sure if that will break other tools. Could I just use a
different spec file for the F-10 and EPEL branches?
Duh.
Yes, you can use a different spec file, or even better:
%if 0%{?fedora}<11 || 0%{?rhel} == 4 || 0%{?rhel} == 5
%exclude %{_bindir}/*.pyc
%exclude %{_bindir}/*.pyo
%endif
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.