https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123242
--- Comment #2 from Mattia Verga <mattia.verga(a)proton.me> ---
- Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
Note: openssl1.1-devel is deprecated, you must not depend on it.
See:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
guidelines/deprecating-packages/
The specfile uses `BuildRequires: pkgconfig(libssl)` which, looking at the
root/build logs, pulls in openssl-devel 1:3.0.5-2 and the final Requires shows
`libssl.so.3(OPENSSL_3.0.0)`.
[!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners:
/usr/share/icons/hicolor/128x128, /usr/share/icons/hicolor,
/usr/share/icons/hicolor/128x128/apps
These should be fixed in the updated specfile
[!]: Development files must be in a -devel package
There are no development files.
[!]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
This is by purpose, see
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/EncourageI686LeafRemoval
[!]: Package contains the mandatory BuildRequires and Requires:.
Note: Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`%{__perl} -V:version`";
echo $version)) missing?
I'm not sure what pulls in the Perl dependency, xephem-data is a noarch package
with just data files...
[!]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in xephem-
data
Fixed.
[!]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all
supported
architectures.
See the ExcludeArch explanation.
[!]: %check is present and all tests pass.
Need to check with upstream why tests are failing.
[!]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Note: Spec file as given by url is not the same as in SRPM (see
attached diff).
Fixed.
Spec URL:
https://mattia.fedorapeople.org/xephem/xephem.spec
SRPM URL:
https://mattia.fedorapeople.org/xephem/xephem-4.1.0%5e20221006b7bfc6e-1.f...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123242