https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438881
--- Comment #9 from Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar(a)redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Jason Tibbitts from comment #8)
Just a note that unless this package contains version 22 of guile,
the
naming guidelines indicate that "guile2.2" is the correct name:
"
[...] All other packages derived from it MUST include the base name suffixed
by either:
* The package version, which SHOULD include the periods present in the
original version.
[...]
The idea is to avoid the confusion between version 2.2 and version 22.
Good point.
FWIW, I prefer guile22 to keep the naming consistent with compat-guile18. There
are other packages not using dots and I think it's very unlikely we would have
guile-2.2 and guile-22 packaged in Fedora at the same time.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component