https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986165
Simone Caronni <negativo17(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Simone Caronni <negativo17(a)gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Simone Caronni from comment #1)
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual
license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
"Unknown or generated". 34 files have unknown license. Detailed output
of
licensecheck in /home/slaanesh/Documents/fedora/986165-jackson-
annotations/licensecheck.txt
[!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[!]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
Fixed in spec file; has it been reported upstream?
[!]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec
file
Note: Found : Packager: Simone Caronni <negativo17(a)gmail.com>
That's my local .rpmmacros.
jackson-annotations.noarch: W: self-obsoletion jackson2-annotations
<= 2.2.2
obsoletes jackson2-annotations = 2.2.2
Can you fix this? Spec file should read:
Obsoletes: jackson2-annotations < %{version}
Provides: jackson2-annotations = %{version}
As per:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Renaming.2FReplacing_...
Please fix it before importing. Package approved.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=gHMPFtQdwg&a=cc_unsubscribe