https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1991202
--- Comment #9 from Didik Supriadi <didiksupriadi41(a)gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Stefan Bluhm from comment #8)
> License field in the package spec file matches the actual
license.
I think there might be misunderstanding from my side. I understood that this
is the licensing of the package and not the content. That is why I picked
that one. Should it be the license of the source files?
Oops, I was claiming Indiana License looks like BSD, I was wrong.
it definitely looks like ASL 1.1 (See
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-1.1)
But you could see the xpp3-*.pom files for the licenses. It is indeed a Public
Domain.
So I think it will be "License: ASL 1.1 and Public Domain".
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component