Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622
--- Comment #23 from Tim Fenn <fenn(a)stanford.edu> 2009-07-22 13:56:48 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #22)
(In reply to comment #21)
> > > - pmgZ and aqua both want to link to a library (src/mg) built in the apbs
> > > package, so both pmgZ and aqua have undefined non-weak-symbols that
reflect
> > > this.
> > >
> > > I'll mention all this upstream, FWIW.
> >
> > Ugh. This really looks like they're not intended to be broken up but should
be
> > just shipped in the main package, if they still are available in libapbs...
>
> Yeah, the choices here aren't that great, but I think I'd rather keep them
> separated with some broken linkages than break the fedora licensing... right?
What do you mean, break Fedora licensing..?
Sorry, that didn't sound right - I meant combining libaqua/pmgZ (LGPLv2+) with
libapbs (BSD) into a single library isn't compatible with fedora licensing?
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.