https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1919295
code(a)musicinmybrain.net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
--- Comment #1 from code(a)musicinmybrain.net ---
Comments on rpmlint messages:
npm-name-cli.noarch: E: useless-provides bundled(nodejs-ansi-styles)
[… many similar messages …]
I do not know why rpmlint thinks this is useless, but these are the required
virtual Provides for the bundled node dependencies. All node-based RPMs under
the new guidelines will have them.
npm-name-cli.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
All node-based RPMs will have this as well, based on the location of
/usr/lib/node_modules/ (%node_sitelib).
npm-name-cli.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir
/usr/lib/node_modules/npm-name-cli/node_modules/.bin
[… many similar messages …]
Dotfiles under node_modules are normal.
npm-name-cli.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/lib/node_modules/npm-name-cli/node_modules_prod/(a)types/normalize-package-data/package.json
[… many similar messages …]
My view is that blindly attempting to correct the many extra or missing
executable bits in bundled node module dependencies is a fool’s errand, more
likely to accidentally break something than accomplish anything useful. (I
would be willing to chmod a-x all .json files if a reviewer felt strongly about
it.)
npm-name-cli.noarch: E: zero-length
/usr/lib/node_modules/npm-name-cli/node_modules_prod/package-json/node_modules/(a)sindresorhus/is/dist/example.d.ts
Again, there is no reason to go mucking around inside the bundled dependencies.
npm-name-cli.src: W: no-%build-section
Normal for a node-based RPM; there is nothing to do.
npm-name-cli.src: W: invalid-url Source1: npm-name-cli-3.0.0-nm-prod.tgz
This is the usual bundled dependencies tarball.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component