https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1801580
--- Comment #18 from Nicolas De Amicis <deamicis(a)bluewin.ch> ---
(In reply to jiri vanek from comment #16)
(In reply to Mario Torre from comment #15)
> (In reply to jiri vanek from comment #14)
> > thank you, Do you mind to elaborate on: "openjfx N runs on openjdk N-1
" it
> > is very hard to accept:(
>
> My understanding is that the N here refers to the latest LTS and is the
> minimal version it runs on. This means for example that current OpenJFX runs
> on 11+, once the next LTS will be released, assuming for example this to be
> OpenJDK 17, OpenJFX will only run on 17+.
>
> Cheers,
> Mario
Nicolas, what Mario says leads us to rename of openjx to openjfx8 requiring
java <= 1.8.0 and this one to openjfx rewuiring java >=11 as is common for
compact packages. WDYT?
I agree with that.
I must to rename openjfx in openjfx8 but for which versions? F30, F31 and F32?
Currently the F32 version is in FTBFS
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1799832. I need to use maven
instead of gradle.
I must make a new package review for this package (renamed from openjfx-11 to
openjfx)?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component