https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359402
--- Comment #8 from Tim Fenn <tim.fenn(a)gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #7)
(In reply to Tim Fenn from comment #6)
> (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #5)
> > (In reply to Tim Fenn from comment #4)
> > >
> > > > - doc sub-package isn't noarch
> > > >
> > >
> > > I didn't specify it as such?
> >
> > I don't see any 'BuildArch: noarch' line...
> >
>
> OK I'll have that fixed in the next build - sorry, I misread this the first
> time.
>
> > >
> > > New files:
> > >
> > > spec:
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BxOz1eBnQT3nOW9XWXZwNzhEY1U
> > > srpm:
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BxOz1eBnQT3nT2FJQjlhYXVTdDA
> >
> > '%defattr(-,root,root,-)' and 'rm -rf %{buildroot}' are used
for epel5 only.
> >
>
> Is the %if 0%{?rhel} not sufficient around these statements? Or should it
> just be removed all together?
If this package isn't for epel5, you can remove all.
OK done.
>
> > Why coot-1.spec ?
> > SPEC file must have same name of src-rpm.
>
> Doh, silly google drive renaming. I'll fix in the next upload.
Why not fedorapeople?
Fair enough - new files:
https://timfenn.fedorapeople.org/coot.spec
https://timfenn.fedorapeople.org/coot-0.8.6.1-3.fc24.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component