Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741626
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Spura <tomspur(a)fedoraproject.org> 2011-10-08 05:30:43 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #3)
(In reply to comment #2)
> Is there a CMake possibility to put them into the ser directory instead?
> Running "mv *.i ser/" after building works, but looks rather hackish...
Maybe. But these are include files...
How about a complete cp then?
e.g.
mkdir ser; cd ser
cp ../* .
%cmake... etc
cd ..
Do you intend to build both serial and parallel versions?
How do you want to name them?
par/ppackmol would only be a script that calls packmol with OMP_THREADS
With copying around anything from above, it would be possible to install
par/packmol as ppackmol and get a backtrace of the segfault with abrt.
> - Why are GPLv3 headers -> GPL+?
> I'd expect GPLv3+ (or GPLv3only) here:
> (minimal) version = version in COPYING.
>
> It would be best to ask upstream to clarify it.
.. where do you see gplv3 headers?
GPL+ for me is any GPL version, that exists and that will come in the future.
When adding a GPLv3 COPYING, I either want to have the program licensed under
GPLv3 or GPLv3+, but not with GPLv2. But I'm not a lawyer, so asking upstream
to clarify it is the best way to be sure.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.