https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418396
--- Comment #6 from Igor Gnatenko <ignatenko(a)redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Jeremy Cline from comment #4)
the-new-hotness needs fedmsg to run it (it declares a moksha.consumer
entry
point in its setup.py which is how fedmsg finds it) so it's not standalone,
exactly. On the other hand, I don't really see people importing it. Given
that, maybe getting rid of the prefix makes the most sense.
Yeah, let's get rid
out of prefix.
(In reply to Jeremy Cline from comment #5)
When I don't have the prefix on the package name, is it still
acceptable to
produce binary packages called python2-the-new-hotness and
python3-the-new-hotness?
why would you do this? why not to put everything in main
package and don't
create subpackages?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component