https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624208
--- Comment #3 from "FeRD" (Frank Dana) <ferdnyc(a)gmail.com> ---
Thanks very much, Robert-André. I appreciate you taking the time to review, and
for and the helpful pointers. I've updated the package in accordance with your
feedback.
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #2)
- Not needed:
- Not used anymore:
- subpackage -devel should require -libs, not the main package:
- To avoid unintended soname bump, it is now forbidden to use a glob for
the major soname version, be more precise instead
- You need to Requires: hicolor-icon-theme to own the icons
directories
- Add gcc as a BR
All completed.
- The license field should also mention CC-BY-SA and add a comment
explaining the license breakdown. Also install COPYING_CCBYSA with %license
in %files.
Done, COPYING_CCBYSA is packaged via %license and the spec now reads:
# Source code is licensed GPLv3+, icons and help files are CC-BY-SA
License: GPLv3+ and CC-BY-SA
I wanted to ask: COPYING_CCBYSA applies two different versions of the CC
license, for some reason.
* the icon files are licensed Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0
* the help content is licensed Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0
Do I need to get into that level of detail in the License: line, or does
"CC-BY-SA" sufficiently cover it?
Updated Spec:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/ferdnyc/parlatype/srpm-bu...
Updated SRPM:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/ferdnyc/parlatype/srpm-bu...
Specfile diff in dist-git:
https://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/cgit/ferdnyc/parlatype/parlaty...
Modulo, possibly, that last question of licensing detail, I believe those
should address all of the necessary changes.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component